| diane arbus | diane arbus's words |
| Diane Arbus was
born in New York City in March of 1923. She studied with
Alexey Brodovitch and Lisette Model. Her father owned a 5th Avenue department store. At the age of 14, Arbus met Allan Arbus, who she would marry in four years. They both worked in the fashion industry as photographers. Arbus's artistic career started in 1959 when she began studying photography with Lisette Model. Arbus received a Guggenheim fellowship in 1963 as well as in '66. A year later, John Szarkowski curated her first exhibit at the Museum of Modern Art. On July 26th, 1971 she committed suicide. "My favourite thing" she told her students shortly before her death "is to go where Ive never been," adding that "nothing is ever the same as they said it was". Arbus's work smashed the boundaries of what is considered to be proper photography. In 1972, the Museum of Modern Art held a major posthumous retrospective of her photographs and she was the first American photographer to be exhibited at the Venice Biennale. |
It's always seemed to me that photography
tends to deal with facts whereas film tends to deal with
fiction. The best example I know is when you go to the
movies and you see two people in bed, you're willing to
put aside the fact that you perfectly well know that
there was a director and a cameraman and assorted
lighting people all in that same room and the two people
in bed weren't really alone. But when you look at a
photograph, you can never put that aside. A whore I once knew showed me a
photo album of Instamatic color pictures she'd taken of
guys she'd picked up. I don't mean kissing ones. Just
guys sitting on beds in motel rooms. I remember one of a
man in a bra. He was just a man, the most ordinary,
milktoast sort of man, and he had just tried on a bra.
Like anybody would try on a bra, like anybody would try
on what the other person had that he didn't have. It was
heartbreaking. It was really a beautiful photograph. |
| Diane Arbus was not a theorist but
an artist. Her concern was not to buttress philosophical
positions but to make pictures. She loved photography for
the miracles it performs each day by accident, and
respected it for the precise intentional tool that it
could be, given talent, intelligence, dedication and
discipline. Her pictures are concerned with private
rather than social realities, with psychological rather
than visual coherence, with the prototypical and mythic
rather than the topical and temporal. Her real subject is
no less than the unique interior lives of those she
photographed. John Szarkowski, 1972 "I have never seen pictures like them before, and I am sure I will never see their equal again. They are the product of something beyond the camera, the result of a long, complex and intensely human process. No one can go into the street tomorrow and take a Diane Arbus photograph. That would be merely adjusting a lens and pressing a button. What made her pictures great was everything that happened before she pressed the button." "Diane Arbus is one
of our legends, her monograph a pivotal classic that
changed the direction of photography in America. She
captured the complexity and the art in reality. The
quality that defines her work and separates it from
almost all other photography is her ability to empathize
on a level far beyond language."
|
|
|
Diane Arbus : A Biography by Patricia Bosworth W.W. Norton & Company ISBN:0393326616 |
Opportunities for sensationalism
abound in a book about Arbus, who already had a history
of severe depressions and a crumbling marriage by the
time she began to take the controversial, technically
innovative pictures of dwarfs, nudists and drag queens
that won her a reputation as "a photographer of
freaks." Bosworth balances the lurid details --
rumors that Arbus had sex with her subjects, that she
photographed her own suicide in 1971 -- with a nuanced
appraisal of an artist whose images captured the uneasy
mood of the 1960s by expressing her personal obsessions. |
| postmedia.net |